Over at Salon.com, Gary Kamiya looks at why "the press gives [Sen. John] McCain a pass for consorting with batshit holy men, but condemns [Sen. Barack] Obama to talk-show hell for the same sin." From the article:
The dirty little secret of mainstream American journalism is that it operates within invisible constraints that conform to some imagined Middle American consensus. The issue isn't that journalists share Hagee and Parsley's views so much as that they know that they are widely held, which makes them reluctant to acknowledge how truly outrageous they are. After years of nodding at the whacked-out likes of Jerry Falwell and Pat Robertson, the media has, to borrow Daniel Patrick Moynihan's famous phrase, defined right-wing religious deviancy down. More or less "orthodox" Christian-right insanity, of the sort espoused by [Rev. John] Hagee and [Rev. Rod] Parsley, is familiar and normal, whereas black-church radicalism, with its ties to left-wing liberation theology, is not. In 2000, 45 percent of the population told Gallup they were either born-again or evangelical Christians.
.....
By incessantly attacking Obama as strange and scary, which is certain to be his strategy, McCain will be tapping into [the] already existing media bias toward sensationalism. His and Bush's outrageous charges that Obama is an "appeaser" are intended to play into this, and much worse is sure to be coming....




