The state board of education in Kansas just passed a science curriculum (i.e. students will be subjected to this) that promotes anti-science and anti-evolution propaganda named "Intelligent Design theory" (ID). ID is not a theory at all, in the scientific sense of the word theory (something repeatedly confirmed through evidence), but a philosophical concept that lacks evidence. What is more, it actually dares to conclude that a perceived lack of evidence (highly selective, of course) for other ideas (in this case, biological evolution) is proof for the existence of God.
Yes--it is, in fact, inherently illogical. (Of course it is, since ID ultimately is not about science; it's about the fear of its proponents. It's about their psychologies.)
ID honks and squeals over a handful of anecdotes that it feels demonstrates a lack of evidence for the long-ago proved theory of evolution--that reality upon which (and which is confirmed by) modern genetics and biology. Those anecdotes include the complexity of the human cell. (i.e. "Cells are complex, thus God exists." How's that for "science?")
Since ID is not evidence-based (but rather based on pointing out things it tries to negatively relate to evolution), it cannot be proved or disproved. It is an intellectual trap, a kind of dope. You can't prove Intelligent Design, which boils down to the non-scientific proposition that "Some things are sometimes really, really complex, so there must be a God," anymore than you can prove "I think therefore I am" or "God is dead" or "We are the stuff of alien races before us" or any other speculative declaration.
But...while it is true that ID is a philosophical, not scientific, entity; it is more specifically true that it is a philosophical and anti-scientific entity. It is grotesquely anti-scientific and hateful of human curiosity, for it essentially declares that when we as human observers see something we just can't figure out, we need to conclude that God exists. We need to quite asking "Why?" and quit trying to figure things out.
Here is what ID is like:
Intelligent Design is like the child who sees an airplane fly through the sky and concludes that there must be a God, because the child knows that gravity exists, yet here is some object defying gravity, an object so complex that it's beyond his understanding (and the child assumes that it always will be beyond anyone's understanding) therefore what he is seeing must be a miracle, therefore--as a miracle--it must be proof of God's existence.
What is more, this type of thinking the child deems to be "science."
So, here we are, The United States of America in 2005: we're like Rome at its most arrogant and myotic, the global superpower self-indulgently dancing in an oblivious haze, drunk on the dope of
*Intelligent Design,
*homosexuality as an immoral condition,
*sex education as something to be withheld from teenagers because it's evil,
*the State of Israel as evidence of the approach of the Antichrist,
*homosexuality as something that can and must be "cured,"
*the definition of a fetus as being fully human (a "child"),
*demon possession,
*the denial of global warming,
*ad hoc religious tests for candidate for elected office (are they "born again?" if not, they oughtn't govern, no matter how qualified),
*divine missions (George W. Bush himself said he was called by God to be President).